Springfield Ohio

Clark County Municipal Court


Crime


The true story starts out like this:

1.) In 2012, a storm that caused the ceiling and roof to fall left me without a home.

2.) The Federal Agency, F.E.M.A., gave me a check to help, but I was still left with nowhere to go for more than 3 months..


FEMA Documented Proof Document FEMA

3.) My mother offered to help by signing a one-year lease with Theresa Crow for a rental located at 1335 North Limestone St. in Springfield Ohio and the three of us met on location.
The Real Lease Document Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1


4.) Following my mother's one-year lease, I and the husband of the Lessor came to an agreement that I would resume the new lease under new payment arrangements

New Lease arrangements Documented EvidenceNew Pay Arrangement
New Payment Arrangements Documented EvidenceShows contrary to Court version of Lease


5.) Due to electrical deficiencies and other problems with the rental, I gave notice to vacate about a year later.

6.) However, a few months after I vacated a notice came in the mail that I was being threatened by the Crows for property damage!   I replied that the Crows were fully made aware of each and every disaster that occurred in their property and that I had videos showing the true cause of damages and that I caused no intentional damage (did I scuff the wall when moving my stuff to safety from the waterfall from upstairs is another story for another page).


This is one of many videos wmv    flv    mp4    mov    dvd    avi that is on the Court Record, yet the Judge denied all evidences and even denied the actual tenant/occupant from the Case, but why?
 Video shows where damages came from.  It was the upstairs tenant's plumbing, and later an upstairs fire.  The landlord and his agents must go through my downstairs rental in order to get to plumbing, electrical, air conditioners, etc. which are all housed in the basement.  Regardless of whether the mud came from the muddy basement or the muddy fire, it should not be either the liability of the tenant, or the former tenant.



6.)  Yet a year after I vacated,  the Crows sued my Mother instead of me!

Wrongful Suit EvidenceSuit Claimed my 70+ year old mother "caused" the damages at the Crow property.

7.) The Courts denied my two written requests to become a party to the case, stating they have the wrong person being sued.  Both were submitted and are on Court Record prior to Pre-Trial.
Motion To Intervene
Request 1 Page 1 Document on Court Record 1st Request Page1  Request 1 Page 2 Document on Court Record 1st Request Page2  Request 1 Page 3 Document on Court Record 1st Request Page 3

Motion To Correct The Record
Request 2 Page 1 Document on Court Record 2nd Request Page 1  Request 2 Page 2 Document on Court Record  2nd Request Page 2  Request 2 Page 3 Document on Court Record 2nd Request Page 3


However the Court DID allow a fictitious Lease into the Court Record submitted by the Crows.
Fraudulent Lease Accepted by Court Evidence The Court's Fraudulent Lease Page1which was submitted to the Court by the Crows and permitted in the Court Record.

The Real Lease Document Mom's Genuine Lease Page 1
*Later, although the Lessor unlawfully kept the deposit beyond that which is lawful, the Court would award a deposit to the Lessor.  But why?  The Lessor's Lease doesn't specify anything about a deposit.  However the Lessor does admit to their being a deposit in two documents already submitted to the Court Record.  So regardless of who the Court wishes to believe was the tenant is immaterial when the Court has willingly allowed a fictitious Lease, from a fictitious Company (Tec Rentals), neither of which exist.

8.)  Both of my Requests to present evidence and witnesses were Denied by Judge Thomas Trempe of Clark County Municipal Court, given were the following reasons:

Springfield Ohio Scandal? Denied  Clark County Fraud? Denied


9. Having been denied twice by the Clark County Municipal Court prior to Pre-Trial, I appealed to the Appellate Division
1st submission to the Appellate to request that the decision by the municipal court judge denying my becoming a party to the case be overturned and allow me to present evidence to show that the allegations are fraudulent and knowingly directed to the wrong party.  The appeal was for a 60(b) motion and was accepted in the Appellate Court in May, 2017.  However the Court did not perform a 60(b) motion,  and instead allowed the lower court to progress to trial until many months later, AND still did not respond until ANOTHER  5 months AFTER the lower court disregarded waiting for the Appellate to come back with an answer to determine whether it was lawful to deny evidence in an ongoing case in which the third party was the only person on the planet that could be proven to be the tenant regarding the exact case being heard in the Court.
Instead, the Appellate,
When the Appellate did respond, it was to this:
Problem
ruling as if the appeal I made to the Appellate at pre-trial would have any bearing or revenue to any party concerning a case in which I'm not permitted to be a party to (in other words, can it be conceivable for an outside party to appeal a future judgment of somebody else's case? ).  The premonition of a future judgment of the lower Court Trial,  as opposed to motion to raise issue of the lower court denying the actual tenant and video evidence, signed documents, rental receipts proving tenancy, audio evidence, witnesses, first-person testimony, and more, denied evidence in a court room would be a more tangible assumption as to what the Appeal to the Appellate may have been taking issue. 
appealed to the Appellate Division 1st submission to the Appellate

To make matters worse,  on March 27, 2018,  the Appellant sends me a letter addressed as a "final" notice.
I have not noticed any loss of command of my mail and would bank my mother's life on the fact that the Courts cannot show they've ever sent a previous notice, although their letter claims they've sent "numerous notices".

The Appellate has sent "Final Notice" demand for money.

It is well established that a payment MUST be made at the time of filing
 OR
must include an afidavit of indigence
before an appeal can be accepted.

As seen on the Court's website, the afidavit was accepted in their office on 9/22/16  (TAGCPM.PA.PublicPortal).

Appeal              Racket Bill  

 
Decision as if it were an appeal to the future verdict of the Trial (in effect stopping all Appeals to the lower Court Trial altogether).



10.)  The Second Appellate Court did not bother to intervene or answer until 5 months A F T E R  the lower Court went ahead with Trial holding my mother un-represented and un-assisted in a Trial.    I would NOT be allowed to present evidences to a case in which I am the obvious correct party to.

When the Appellate did respond, it was to this regard:
http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/2/2017/2017-Ohio-2779.pdf

To find out how a Court finds the previous downstairs tenant to pay for the damages caused by the upstairs tenant.

  Click  >Next








Court Record

* My having published videos on youtube were censored.  So I uploaded to an alternative site:   showing the true cause for damages,

Suddenly Codes wanted to investigate me. 
  mp3   flv    mp4   avi  wav

Charter attack:

Denied Passport :


Drive-by:

I was asked to take down my mailbox
(the one that was approved by the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE).




See the timeline here






Sites of Clark County Community Interest:
Bible       Free Dump Site for Springfield       Clark County Terror       Ohio's Shame       Stolen in Ohio?       Municipal Court Racket?       "My people, when ye see these signs, come out of her" Holy Crap, my Passport is denied!        Springfield Ohio Room and Home       Brick Projects       Solar Projects

2803 Troy Road Springfield Ohio 45504 Product of USA
THIS WEBSITE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION, READ AT YOUR OWN RISK!  There are over 30,000 files in this site and all are to be considered a rough draft pending a final edit.
Telephone:
+1 (937) 718-3586