Did that conversation not
sound strange to you?
Welcome to my world.
There's a series of
oddities, I'll list a few of them on this page. I'll update this
page someday maybe, but for now this is just my personal record.
2.) Initially my
year old mother met with George Degenhart, the German Township Codes
Enforcer, and stated her son's intents
(I'm her son). She inquired as to what the requirements
were for a
home-based business. She was told by the Codes Enforcement
that there were no requirements and that her son (me) ought to do as
him and his wife, put up a sign for a period as specified allowable,
and that for a week take the sign down after which it would be able to
be re-erected for another allowable term and that he was not going to
be religiously checking on the sign anyway. He simply stated to
keep the home-based business low-key. Three
days after I moved in the small 4sf sign went up. Two days later
we were being threatened with
$100per day forfeiture and criminal proceedings.
3.) Since I was
being threatened against having the lawful sign
Have been advised
to change the
color of the lights (*inside
that if I did not
comply there would be $100.00 per day forfeiture and criminal
(no, it's not the mobsters, the
mexicans, chinese, iraq, iran or
afghanistan, it's not the Russians, Japanese, Vietnamese, It's not Laos
or Cuba .... and we dare not call it what it is: manipulation,
racketeering, manipulation, profiteeering,
etc... But it is the parent to the
masses, our Government (LLC) that is doing this.
5.) Within a
couple of weeks of having moved to the property in the German Township
of Springfield Ohio, the Codes Department stated there were
"numerous complaints" against me. Those "numerous" complaints
melted down to a solitary complaint and ended up being one very
QUESTIONABLE unverifiable "complaint" since the data anyone would need
to be able to verify the complaint is completely redacted out with a
marker. It is not known if the arguably unlawful redacting was
made by the German Township or the Clark County Prosecutor -
wouldn't anyone find that unnecesarily antagonistic?
coming to you and saying your under arrest because some person that you
will never know made a complaint against you....how would you know the
claim was even real? By all appearances, the complaint
itself isn't even real (and certainly cannot be determined for
authenticity since there's marker through all the relevant data.
6.) Initially, I
immediately made numerous requests for
the copies of the "numerous" complaints against me. All were
either ignored, in violation of FOIA (freedom of information act), FOIL
(Freedom of information law), the "Sunshine Law" (seriously), or
whatever they're calling being open and honest this year.
However one time,
prior to finally sending the redacted questionable complaint, the D.A.
of Clark County in Springfield Ohio responded by sending incorrect Case
Law of an irrelevant use of restricting common information. In
fact, the case law the D.A. sent was more in bolstering my claim for
information as being allowable by law (the case law he sent to me
showed redacting/obfuscating was permissable only when an underage
child was involved.
Unless an underage
child made the solitary (aka numerous) complaint(s) against me, then
it's lawful to be honest and open and I ought to be permitted to know
and address the accuser (Was the accuser a neighbor (no. I
recorded conversations with the neighbors on both sides of me and two
houses to the north). The Codes Department stated it was my
neighbors that made the complaints (which ended up being only one ...
there seems to be the making of a pattern offender here. Is the
accuser real at all? If the complaintant was underage, is it
lawful for an underage person to file a complaint? And if so, at what
age do they become enforcable? Should a six-year old be the
impetus behind the Codes Department's enforcement? Since
none of my immediate neighbors have underage children in their houses,
how do we know this entire attack is not conjured up and unwarranted by
the same entity that told the apparent misinformation claiming my
neighbors at the root of the evil?
What would we do
without cameras in
a political clime-crime such as this?
(with police escort, 2 ODOT vehicles, and not at liberty to say who
was driving that little pickup preceding the Police): Play Recording
Notes concerning the simple request to address the allegation(s)
In violation of the "Sunshine Law" a.k.a. Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA), a.k.a. Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), the
repeated requests for information consisting of the “complaints” being
waged against me had been arrogantly and antagonistically either
ignored or responded with nonsense codes and law from un-related other
areas including child-protection
those that receive money from us via taxation, fees, fines, licenses,
etc. had stated that the numerous complaints against me were coming
took the initiative to record the conversations with each of the
neighbors within 300 yards of my location. Apparently
another official has fabricated a lie, and as of a few
months ago my petition can be found on the USGov
Site to join the signatures of tens of thousands of others that have
also signed, giving reasons that are valid, to repeal the immunity
clause for government officials regardless of whether or not they are
proven to be abusive of their
privileges for personal gain or otherwise.
After much ado, whether authentic or not, only one solitary
REDACTED document was sent in response to my legal
request. That solitary complaint
was illegally REDACTED and made of no avail. In other
words, they sent a paper with black marker through the information so
that one would not even be able to ascertain whether the "complaint"
was real at all. Is this what the workers are programmed to
do? Violate our National law without fear of criminal proceedings
against themselves (immunity clauses, once repealed, could cause a
great many to pay dearly for their thoughtless error in mindless chain
of command mentality).
Degenhart works for the German Township in Springfield Ohio
as a Codes Enforcer, he hasn't any legal right to threaten people
exploitation by means of threats, of causing harm through utilizing
criminal proceedings, monetary forfietures, investigations, or
intrusions via mail, telephone, etc.
George Degenhart is an Codes Enforcer and has limited
To make matters
worse, the very inspector is the one that is guilty of the very
things he's accused me
1.) He and his wife were/are running an illegitimate
2.) The business is being operated out of their detached garage
a home-based business must be
from within the living space itself and cannot be a detached building,
according to his own codes book
Degenhart's had/have a sign for their illegitimate business right above
the garage door
yet a sign permit could not be
definition: Often associated with
organized crime, is the act of offering of a dishonest service (a
"racket") to solve a problem that wouldn't otherwise exist without the
enterprise offering the service.
Racketeering as defined by the RICO
act includes a list of 35 crimes.