This Website is Completely Solar Powered! - Springfield, OH - Read it and Weep

Ohio's Clark County Municipal Court Sham(e) Page 3

Our Nation CAN do Better than This!

Below are personal sentiments at the given moment in time

Rotting House

Apparent Disgraceful Gang-land Judiciary in Springfield Ohio

Where robbing the elderly is respectable?

Page 3

Eric and Theresa Crow claimed to the Court that a fire had been made in the fireplace causing smoke damage. It was never established if any reference was made to the fire that actually required the Springfield Fire Department to extinguish (which was caused by the upstairs neighbor).

Since the court was adamant about dragging an innocent person (and the wrong person at that) through their courts, and since my repeated Motions to become a party to the case (because I am the party to the very case), were denied by the Municipal Court and apparently ignored by the Second Appellate Court that was requested to intervene and correct the error perpetuated by Judge Trempe of the Lower Municipal Court, I was not permitted to explain why I had made a fire in the fireplace and show the video of why I made the fire and how quickly I extinguished the fire which caused no real smoke damage at all. If the legitimate court would have honored my request to become a party to the case in which I ought to be made a party, the reason for the fireplace being used would have been divulged.

If the Landlord could keep his Furnace and other electrical items operating, the fire would not have been attempted in the fireplace (in the first place).

The Clark County Municipal Court concluded that the previous tenant to me, a 70 year old woman, caused damage. A woman that wasn't even in the same State.

So I agree to the part that there indeed was a fire made in attempt to get warmth, but nowhere in the lease was it specified that the Fireplace was capped off (neglectful disregard for disclosure).

But what they left out was the whole story.

Nowhere in either my mother's lease nor my lease was it mentioned that the fireplace was inoperable.

Futhermore, there is stout evidence that the Eric and Theresa Crow knowingly signed an affidavit that the fireplace was/is working

Eric and Theresa Crow Lie

At the bottom of the page is a checkmark that the fireplace is A-ok.

Notice the intials in the Affidavit shown by the link below?

Deceptive Activity should not be aided and abetted by the justus system

Those are the intials of Eric Crow and Theresa Crow, in which they both stated the fireplace is in proper working order.

Margaret Baldino found guilty of causing smoke damage. Alleged to have been using a fireplace owned and leased by Eric and Theresa Crow and ordered to pay in excess of $4,000.00 to the husband of her Lessor.

Fireplace works in this hand, fireplace doesn't work in the other and as pertaining to the stained carpets, read on to find how a Court finds the previous downstairs tenant at fault to pay for the damages caused by the upstairs tenant.

The Clark County Municipal Court Found my mother guilty of making a fire in the fireplace.

There's just a few dozen problems with that judicial determination, I'll mention only one on this page.

The Plaintiffs, Eric and Theresa Crow have claimed smoke damage.

Yet their Leases do not state the fireplace was not in working order (and the smoke damage was inconsequential anyway). Then a fire from the upstairs tenant and the subsequent downpour of water into the building is magically my mother's fault also (even though she was a resident in Florida!

Apparently the landlord's claim shown below is variable.

And yet the Judge didn't want this evidence in "his" courtroom.

So I'm attaching the evidence here:

Klark Kounty Kourt

Eric and Theresa Crow, herein commonly referred to as the Crows, claimed the fireplace is working as shown above. Nowhere in the Crow lease was there any mention that the fireplace had magically changed its status.

But in a biased Court the innocent are preyed upon. Notice also on the affidavit made by Theresa and Eric Crow that there are/were problems with the Central Heating and Air (which is why I started a fire in the fireplace in the first place!). Ohio gets cold in the winer-time.

Not to mention that the "smoke damage" was painted over by me with my own paint. The whole argument for smoke damage was never brought up during the walk-through inspection following my informing to Eric Crow that I was vacating. Again, the ONLY issue Eric Crow had was with the square hole seen in the video that shows I repaired it properly.

The Clark County Municipal Court of Springfield Ohio's Judge Trempe did not allow Any of the evidences, nor a first-person party to be permitted to present videos that show the claim is a hoax.

Keeping this and other evidence out of the case, thereby finding a 70+ year old innocent *(previous tenant) Florida woman guilty of damages to the Ohio property, Sound incredible yet? It gets better, hold on to your last reasoning brain cell.

***Please note that the video DOES NOT PLAY ON MOBILE OR TABLET DEVICES.

For Information concerning this issue, contact me
Kenny Hendrick
(937) 718-3586
2803Troy Road Springfield Ohio 45504

Read about Case Number 15CVF02981

Keep in mind that I appealed the Municipal Court's Decision to keep me and the evidence out of the Court at about Pre-Trial-time to the Second Appellate Court in what I thought was clearly a 60b motion to force the lower court to allow me to present evidence in their Court.

Many months went by without so much as a word from the Appellate, they even waited months after the lower court went to trial to finally make a determination, "We concur with the lower court".....phhhtttt....of course you people do. Look up the definition to "Racket" in any dictionary and tell me how this doesn't fit.

Topic Two: Old lady found guilty of being "the cause" of damage to ceiling tiles and carpet.

The Clark County Municipal Court's Judge Trempe denied clear evidence, videos that show water coming from the upstairs tenant causing ceiling tiles and water damage to the tenant space below.

Do you see my mom in this video? Since when is it to be construed as "justice" to find the downstairs tenant liable for the actions of EITHER the upstairs tenant's negligence or the crackpy plumbing/electrical installations of the landlord?

The Courts found my mother guilty of damages to ceiling tiles (4) and carpet (the entire single style/type carpet) totalling $4k+.

Apparently the Judge, using his best expensive judgment, thought it right to replace the entire carpet for the few stains located mainly in two rooms (caused by the floods, the landlord and his workmen, the firemen, and others that had to trek through the rented space to get down to the utilities basement). One thing is certain though, my mom did NOT "cause" the damages.

Why would the Clark County Municipal Court not allow video evidence?

To show our videos are authentically made, here is the Plaintiffs' realtor which uploaded his video to Youtube long before I or my mother leased from Eric or Theresa Crow's Property.

3-years before I or my mother leased with Eric Crow or Theresa Crow, check out the carpet:

The videos are the same property, 1335 North Limestone Street in Springfield Ohio.

Topic Three:The Claim against Margaret Baldino


My mother could NOT have been the "Cause" for damages. Not only was she in Florida at the time of the damages, but can also show that she had become domiciled in Florida almost two years prior to the suit having been filed in the Clark County Municipal Court of Springfield Ohio.

Judge Trempe did not allow any evidence, nor a first-person party to become a Party to the claim which was filed by the Crows, keeping these and other evidences out of the case, thereby finding a 70+ year old Florida woman guilty of damages to the Ohio property.

Sound incredible?

There's more evidences that were flatly denied in the Clark County Court, buy why?


Photos and videos that show the actual time-frame and the actual live flooding.

Signed Documents prior to the suit having been filed


Signature-verified correspondence during the proceedings

The actual CORRECT party to the issue

The actual CORRECT lease to the issue and more.

Does it sound like a legitimate court that would deny so many evidences?

Next Page